Abstract

The aim of this study to investigate the impact of decentralisation by devolution on farmers’ access to agricultural extension services in selected villages in Dodoma, Tanzania. The specific objectives of the study are (i) to examine the availability and distribution of agricultural extension staff at ward and village levels and (ii) to examine farmers’ accessibility to agricultural extension services at the local level. Data for the study were collected from a sample of 273 farmers in three wards of Hombolo, Kikombo and Chigongwe, using questionnaire survey, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and documentary review. Data analysis techniques involved descriptive statistics, chi-square test and qualitative content analysis. The findings show that implementation of decentralisation has contributed to increased availability and distribution of agricultural extension staff at the ward and village levels. This has enhanced farmers’ access to several agricultural extension services. Nevertheless, the number of extension staff is still far below to meet the needs of farmers, partly because Local Government Authorities do not have the discretion to recruit their staff which is still under the mandates of the Central Government. It is recommended that local government authorities should be given more authority and mandates to recruit extension staff according to their needs.

Keywords:

Access, agricultural extension service, availability, decentralisation by devolution, local government authorities, small scale farmers,

References

1. Andrews, C.W. and M.S. de Vries, 2007. High expectations, varying outcomes: Decentralization and participation in Brazil, Japan, Russia and Sweden. Int. Rev. Administ. Sci., 73(3): 424-451.
   CrossRef    
2. Bashaasha, B., M.N. Mangheni and E. Nkonya, 2011. Decentralization and Rural Service Delivery in Uganda. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Development Strategy and Governance Division. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01063.
   
3. Batley, R., 2004. The politics of service delivery reform. Develop. Change, 35(1): 31-56.
   CrossRef    
4. Cohen, L., 2000. Research Methods in Education. Routledge Falmer, London.
   
5. Conyers, D., 1990. Decentralization and development planning. In: de Valk, P. and K.H. Wekwete, (Eds.): Decentralizing for participatory development? Comparing the Experiences of Zimbabwe and Other Anglophone Countries in Eastern and Southern Africa Aldershot, Avebury, pp: 15-33.
   
6. Daniel, E., 2013. Assessment of agricultural extension services in Tanzania. A Case Study of Kyela, Songea Rural and Morogoro Rural Districts. Internship Report in Plant Sciences. University of Wageningen, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   
7. Haug, R., 1999. Some leading issues in international agricultural extension, a literature review. J. Agri. Edu. Extens., 5(4): 263-274.
   CrossRef    
8. JICA, 2008. Local Service Delivery, Decentralization and Governance. A comparative Study of Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania Education, Health and Agriculture Sectors. Research Group, Institute for International Cooperation (IFIC), Tokyo.
   
9. Lynch, S.M., 2013. Using statistics in social research. Princeton University, New Jersey.
   CrossRef    
10. Masanyiwa, Z.S., A. Niehof and C.J.A.M. Termeer, 2013. Institutional arrangements for decentralized water and health services delivery in rural Tanzania: Differences and constraints. Basic Res. J. Soc. Pol. Sci., 1(4): 77-88.
    Direct Link
11. Masanyiwa, Z.S., A. Niehof and C.J. Termeer, 2015a. A gendered users' perspective on decentralized primary health services in Rural Tanzania. Int. J. Health Plann. Manage., 30(3): 285-306.
    CrossRef    PMid:24285278    
12. Masanyiwa, Z.S., A. Niehof and C.J. Termeer, 2015b. Users' perspectives on decentralized rural water services in rural Tanzania. Gender, Place Cult. J. Feminist Geograp., 22(7): 920-936.
    CrossRef    
13. Matee, A.Z., 1994. Reforming Tanzania's agricultural extension system: The challenges ahead. Afri. Stud. Monograp., 15(4): 177-188.
    Direct Link
14. Mehrotra, S., 2006. Governance and basic social services: Ensuring accountability in service delivery through deep democratic decentralization. J. Int. Develop., 18(2): 263-283.
    CrossRef    
15. Msuya, C.P. and R.M. Wambura, 2016. Factors influencing extension service delivery in maize production by using agricultural innovation system in Morogoro and Dodoma Regions, Tanzania. South Afr. J. Agric. Ext., 44(2): 248-255.
    CrossRef    
16. Nambiro, E., J. Omiti and L. Mugunieri, 2005. Decentralization and Access to Agricultural Extension Services in Kenya. Strategies and Analysis for Growth and Access, (SAGA) a project of Cornell and Clark Atlanta Universities, funded by cooperative agreement #HFM-A-00-01-0013200 with the United States Agency for International Development. SAGA Working Paper, October 2005.
    
17. Ribot, J.C., A. Agrawal and A.M. Larson, 2006. Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments re-appropriate forest resources. World Develop., 34(11): 1864-1886.
    CrossRef    
18. Rutatora, D.F. and A.Z. Mattee, 2001. Major agricultural extension providers in Tanzania. Afri. Stud. Monograp., 22(4):155-173.
    Direct Link
19. Termeer, C.J.A.M., A. Dewulf and M. van Lieshout, 2010. Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: Comparing monocentric, multilevel and adaptive governance. Ecol. Soc., 15(4): 29.
    CrossRef    
20. URT (United Republic of Tanzania), 1998. Policy Paper on Local Government Reform. Local Government Reform Program. Ministry of Regional Administration and Local Government. Local Government Reform Programme, Dar es Salaam.
    
21. URT (United Republic of Tanzania), 2008. The Status of Implementation of Decentralisation by Devolution on Mainland Tanzania and the Way Forward. Paper Presented at the National Convention on Public Sector Reforms 17-18th June 2008, Ubungo Plaza, Dar es Salaam.
    
22. URT (United Republic of Tanzania), 2009. Local Government Reform Programme II (Decentralization by Devolution): Vision, Goals and Strategy July 2009-June 2014. Prime Mini-ster's Office-Regional Administration and Local Government, Dodoma.
    
23. URT (United Republic of Tanzania), 2013. National Agricultural Policy. Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives, Dar es Salaam.
    
24. URT (United Republic of Tanzania), 2015. Agricultural Sector Development Strategy II 2015/2016-2024/2025. Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Cooperatives, Dar es Salaam.
    
25. URT (United Republic of Tanzania), 2016. National Five-Year Development Plan 2016/2017-2020/21. Nurturing Industrialization for Economic Transformation and Human Development. Ministry of Finance and Planning, Dar es Salaam.
    
26. Venugopal, V. and S. Yilmaz, 2010. Decentralization in Tanzania: An assessment of local government discretion and accountability. Pub. Administ. Develop., 30(3): 215-231.
    CrossRef    
27. World Bank, 2000. Decentralizing Agricultural Extension: Lessons and Good Practice. Agricultural Knowledge and Information Systems (AKIS), The World Bank, Washington D.C.
    
28. World Bank, 2004. World Bank Development Report 2004: Making Services Better for Poor People. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
    
29. World Bank, 2008. Decentralization in Client Countries. An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 1990-2000. World Bank Independent Evaluation Group, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
    
30. World Bank, 2010a. Strengthening Agricultural Extension and Advisory Systems: Procedures for Assessing, Transforming, and Evaluating Extension Systems. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 45. The World Bank.
    
31. World Bank, 2010b. Gender and Governance in Rural Services: Insights from India, Ghana and Ethiopia. The International Food Policy Research Institute. The World Bank, Washington, D.C:
    

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Open Access Policy

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Copyright

The authors have no competing interests.